Enjoying this issue?
Get tomorrow's AI & engineering digest in your inbox — hand-picked, summarized, and always spam-free.
TLDR
Existing agent frameworks that require editing prompts in code are counterproductive for building reliable background agents. A better approach uses event-driven YAML configurations, a content-addressed system for exact prompt traceability, and strict structured output boundaries to make failures impossible rather than just unlikely. This pattern has been successfully deployed for 20 production agents, and open-source models are already sufficient for non-coding agent tasks.
Key points
- Rémi Louf spent two weeks in December 2024 deeply exploring agents after noticing a step change in model capability, which he attributes to 'Opus 4.6' (likely Claude Opus).
- He found that existing agent frameworks force developers to edit prompts inside code, making iteration and review difficult; he switched to YAML files for agent definitions for easier versioning and collaboration.
- Instead of using cron jobs for periodic tasks, he built an event-driven system where agents subscribe to typed events and emit new events, enabling fully asynchronous background workflows.
- Initial failures (duplicate Slack posts, lost voice notes, garbage market briefs) led him to implement an append-only event log, a proper queue with retry tracking, and a content-addressed system for prompt components.
- The content-addressed system stores each prompt piece (system prompt, tool descriptions, user message) as a hash, allowing exact traceability of what the model saw, diffs between runs, and replay with different models.
- Structured outputs are non-negotiable for reliable event boundaries: tool calls and inter-agent events must be typed and enforced. He found that one provider (Infropic) was so bad at structured outputs that 20% of events were rejected.
- After a month of production deployment, the system runs 20 agents contributed by both technical and non-technical people, handling morning briefs, voice notes, and other workflows.
- He advises building your own agent orchestration before buying, and notes that open-source models (including local ones) are already sufficient for non-coding agent tasks.
Techniques
- event-driven architecture
- typed events for agent communication
- content-addressed prompt storage
- append-only event log
- YAML configuration for agent definitions
- structured outputs for tool calls and events
- prompt hashing for traceability
- causal linking of events
- replay with different models
- KV cache management via graph manipulation
Stop scrolling. Start reading smarter.
Receive the day's most important AI & engineering updates in one concise email. No spam.
Transcript (captions)
[music] Hi everyone. So originally I thought I was going to give a very technical talk but I saw was in the leadership track which I'm not sure what it means but I
was like okay I'm going to do half high level and half technical. So it's more a story about what I you know what I did in January because in around December um agents kind of became really good uh you
know there was a step function something happened uh I think it was opus 4.6 six and that's when I realized and I work in AI where I was like okay this thing is really happening and so I took two weeks
out I took two weeks away so I'm the CEO of text uh you know which is 15 people company I just told my CTO I was like okay I'm just going to go away for two weeks and I'm just going to dive in this
thing and try to understand what we can get out of it and how good it is and so the story is you know it is the story of me scratching my own itch for two weeks and trying to figure out how we can use
actually use agents and what are good primitives to build agents and whether you know it already exists. Um this was a really clickbait title but actually it turns out to be a good title even for
this talk. Um so what you can see here on the left the castle is my office. Uh that's true. I do rent an office in Castle and the small thing with an arrow uh that you can see is like this robot
mower which kind of works unattended all day every day. Uh it just does its stuff in the background without anyone having to use a remote control or think about it or anything. And I kind of wanted the
same thing for my morning because my mornings are always the same thing the first couple hours. It's browse market news review of like linear could be Jira my CRM and also I like to walk for an
about an hour in the morning and then the next hour is spent trying to process the really long voice note that you know was recorded while walking and you know all I wanted was my morning briefing
with my coffee and that's kind of what we've been told for a couple of years like what the future would be. Um, but then when you really start working with it, even if you're not coding, all you
get is a TUI today. Uh, so it's amazing. You can code. You can actually, you know, I started doing things that were not coding in it. They're great for this. Uh, agents are great for this, but
it's kind of the equivalent of having a robot like a tractor mower that you still have to stay on even if it's driving by itself, right? It's kind of very frustrating because you have to it
can do many things but you still have to be on and so of course the labs didn't stop there and they came up with apps uh which I call basically SSH with vibes that's great but in this situation when
that came up I was like wow that's awesome I don't have to use like a ter like SSH on my phone anymore codeex is great however I noticed I just started you know I was on my walk and I was just
instructing the agent to do things while I was walking and so I wasn't thinking you know very clearly anymore. I just started running agents on my phone during my morning walk. And this is not
great because this is the equivalent of this is you're kind of midway uh you know it's not the tractor that you have to stay on. It can actually do something without you being right next to it. But
you still have this remote control that you know you kind of have to change the trajectory every now and then. Uh that's useful. It's kind of absurd uh when you think about it and actually when you
look at people like on their phone all the time just doing this, it's kind of absurd and it's clearly transitional. Like surely we're not it's not it's not going to stop there. Um and so I did a
very dumb thing as a co which is I started coding uh don't tell my board and I started to build the dumbest thing that could possibly work. And of course it became a really a crazy rabbit hole.
Uh the repo is there if you want to take a look at it. The code is not amazing. Uh but it works. Um so the first thing is that you know I started using frameworks. Uh I mean there are great
frameworks. I'm not going to name any frameworks because they're all good in their own way and they all have flows in their own way which is fine. Uh but I spent all my time actually editing the
prompt within the code and I was like this is actually not very useful. So I'm like everyone here, I hate YAML u like the next guy, but I still found that this was actually a lot easier to start
implementing agents without code. Uh you can version it, you can diff it, uh you can review in the PR. Um but it's just and it's just so easy. You can just, you know, write your file, you drop it in a
folder, and then it just magically appears once you have the runtime and it just magically works. Um, and you know, then I needed like my market watch to run every morning while I'm, you know,
while I'm walking in the fields. And for that we have things that, you know, uh, have been around for a while, which is chron jobs. uh and schedules specify you know when the agents need to be run and
also we'll see it's very important later uh they publish uh they publish events and you know markdown and chron obviously you know it's much more complicated than under the hood but the
interface is this you don't write code and that's the whole product so far and honestly just mostly worked at this point I'll I'll come back on mostly uh later And so this is actually a real
picture of my one of my morning walks. And so what I do is I record voice notes while I'm walking. Uh but chron you know chron jobs I mean people would use chron jobs for this because that's what's
available in codeex today but they're not ideal because they cover when but this is just one point in time. It doesn't cover because this happened and you know things that happened in our
system like automatically when you drop the voice note now in the system it will emit an event and an agent will react to that event and it's the same thing when you have a new email a new entry in the
CRM I mean anything a new PR that's open a new PR that's merged etc just reacts to events it's not just a chrome job and that and that means that you know agents of the Voice note processor is just you
know not a chron job but here you have accepts and returns. So it just declare what it accepts and what it returns as an event and here it accepts a voice note transcribes it turn it into durable
notes on the right and it emits a new event and for that it uses structured outputs. We'll come back to this. And you know, now we finally have the future we're promised because that voice note
agent emits voice note processed. And then I have my daily brief agent that actually will take the output of the chrome job. We'll take the output of the voice note agents and we create my daily
brief which is posted as a slack message. So the slack message.post post event is actually uh is actually like um a process actually subscribes to this and emits uh and sends a slack message
to me. It's actually this is a real this is a real thing. It's working. I can show you after on my phone and you know there are frameworks that are going to sell you the fact that you need graphs
for this in code. Uh you do not need graph uh in this case. All you need is events. You have no edges to maintain. Agents sub simply subscribe to events. Anyone can come in and edit this. You
don't need to. Yeah, you don't need to know how to code. You just need to know what events exist in the system. Fun and fan out are free. No code and it's just drop a file and the topology emerges
whatever the log says happened. And you know then of course I I tried to run it. So the first version took about I mean you know I cheated I cheated I used
uh I used codeex and it took about like a day to write like the first thing uh out of my week but of course I tried it and it broke uh so these are real examples actually the dates know but
it's real examples it's like the first day delay brief was posted to Slack twice um on Wednesday one of my voice notes completely vanished and then you know towards the end of the week. I I
kind of like played with the prompts all week and the market brief was garbage, but I didn't version uh I didn't version my changes and I couldn't remember actually what I changed in the prompt
that made the thing completely useless. Now, if there are distributed or existed engineers in the room, you probably know this shopping list already. uh there is nothing new under the sun and you know
each failure so each of these failure modes that you found actually led to building one piece of what turned out to be a runtime. So the lost note actually turned into a log. I just wanted
everything to be saved forever so that I could go back to it and look into uh into what happened. the duplicates. It was because I was not following, you know, it did several attempts and I was
not following them. I didn't have a proper queue. I wasn't counting the attempts, etc., etc. And then probably the most interesting part is the last prompt. I got into a really deep rabbit
hole in there and I just ended up uh building a content like a content addressed system for this uh content addressed system. You can think of git uh you can think of nyx and any other
build system. And you know that was and I didn't do this because I wanted to design a runtime. I mean by that point I still just wanted my agents to work and I also like the distraction. Uh and I
just paid off debt as it appeared like errors as they appeared. I hope my board won't see this talk. Uh so the log the log is the systems memory. Uh nothing is lost and
everything is observed. uh you can you know you only have one append only events table on the left it's a real common line uh in like command za events and you get all the events they are
causally linked as well like you know which event triggered which event which happens to be super useful when you're debugging and you know even with three four agents you start having like major
debugging headaches so that was super super helpful Um and everything is querable which again for debugging. The second thing is you know okay we
have a log so we can trace back things etc. But it's still really hard to know what went into the like what went to the model what prompt was sent to the model again because what you see when you're
using codecs is kind of a lie. like you kind of have like a live chat session with the model and so you tend to think that oh that's what the model saw and you know that's exactly so I can
understand what happened the truth is that's not exactly what the model saw um there are many reasons for that one is I mean compaction obviously is a big part is a big thing but also you know there
are just quirks also you know openai doesn't share or enthropic for that matter don't share the thinking with you the thinking traces so you have no idea I mean kind of have an idea of what went
in but not completely either. And so you need something different. Uh you need something different and that was the big rabbit hole which is trying to find a way or build a system where you can
trace back to what the model saw internally. And so what I did was basically built I mean nothing new. This is basically how build system works. Uh so you have different parts for a
prompt. You have your system prompt. You have a description of your first skill of a second skill. Then you have the description of your tools. You have your user message which is the question to
the model. Each one of those is stored and addressed and you know stored somewhere as a identifier which is a hash. And so when we build a prompt instead of building a piece of I mean
before rendering the text we actually represent the prompt as a list of these u of these hashes. And so what that means is that down the line when I have a model answer, which by the way is also
stored in the same way, we can trace back to the prompt very easily. And then from that prompt, we can know exactly what went into the model's context, which actually matters a lot. I mean, it
matters a lot for debugging, but it also matters. I mean, it makes compaction a lot easier. You're just manipulating a graph, right? You're not manipulating strings. It's just a lot easier. And it
makes KV cache management a lot easier as well indirectly. And but I think that when you know I guess probably the main advantage that's when you use that scale is really auditability. It's
like you can know exactly what happened with that agent and why it returned what it returned. And so you know I'm just going to go pretty pretty quickly over this. Uh what you get once you have this
graph is you get diffs like you can say okay what changed between these two runs like which com which components changed was it just my message did I like give the model a different skill did I give
it a different tool so you can just yeah you can just run this function and it will show you you know the difference between uh the runs so here you have you [snorts] know three components that were
identical there's one which is you know the user message changed And then you had all these other messages that were actually you know that were continuing. It's continuation of a single session.
Uh then you have another thing for free which is replace. Uh replays turned out to be really useful for me because after a while I mean when I saw the cost ramp up like the thing when you have
observability is that you do realize that cost increase very quickly. I wanted to try with open source models and so I wanted to rebuild old request for to eval. and see if I got the same
thing out, if I got something satisfactory, if I need to change anything. And turns out that once you have uh you know this content addressing system, you can rebuild the request from
the graph and you can just replay it exactly the same and you can you know resend, you can use a different model. Uh you can use a different request if you want, you can uh you can change it
and so yeah, you get actually a lot of things I mean for free. You need to implement a thing. Um and so this is kind of different um from what you find I mean what I found when I started doing
this it might be different today because it was a couple of months ago is that out there you had a lot of libraries so it's just frameworks and frameworks just call code uh your agents leave inside
their abstractions um and I don't like analogies with you know operating system okay everyone has used that analogy but okay let's say a kernel
like runs processes and your agent kind of is a process. It doesn't matter what it does actually. Uh but the system can schedule it is built to isolate it. It can isolate it and journals it with the
log and the agent definition. So the markdown is user land like you don't need to use it with that system if you don't want to actually have a front end that doesn't use this markdown uh this
markdown format at all. And okay, here's a very important point and you know that's kind of a takeaway and it's also what justifies me working on this because disclaimer structured outputs is
our specialty and we've been working on this for three years and it just ended up being a big dog fooding project and the reason why I did this at the beginning was not because I absolutely
wanted to use our software. I didn't necessarily want to you know forklP to other software etc. It's just because Infropic was terrible at structured outputs and so like 20% of my events
were wrong and were rejected by the system. So that's why I ended up doing this. And the goal, you know, the job of the kernel is actually to make bad actions impossible, not just unlikely.
And so you have this two boundaries with between agents and the external world. The first one is type tool calls. The two tool calls uh you don't want, you know, you don't want to call tools that
don't exist, etc., etc. and also the boundary with other agents which is typed events and this is non-negotiable I found like you can get a lot of errors just from this uh I wrote a really long
blog post about this uh it's if you follow the QR code you'll find it and yeah and the result of that is I actually deployed it uh within the company after I built this and now today
after a month of deploying it we have 20 agents on the left that are not just contributed by technical people by the way which is kind of what markdown uh what Maron gives you and then on the
right is you know we deploy it's called the internet there's the briefs there's a bunch of I mean there's a bunch of things as you can as you can see kind of like a few you know as a
conclusion a few lessons uh the first one is that well executed background agents are really magical uh they feel like this you know robot mower that I had at the beginning is I really just
sit down and I come back and I have this morning brief that is probably even better than what I would have had just doing it manually and it just appears in my inbox every day and processes my you
know random thoughts. Uh the difficulties that you meet doing this kind of thing is just good old engineering problems. I mean there's really nothing new under the sun when it
comes to orchestrating these things. It's just good old software orchestration. Uh open source models are there. Uh they're good enough. I replaced so I don't have any third party
APIs anymore. Now I just use open source models and even on my laptop I use a local model. Uh so it's good enough for what I do with it. For coding I don't know but for what I do with this it's
good enough. The infro category is definitely unsettled. Uh I tried a few things before I started building myself. And I would advise that today like definitely start building before you
buy. Uh so if you're a small company, if you're a tech CEO, it's kind of an advantage because you can just do this without, you know, tasking engineers to do this and get them off track. But I
would definitely try to build before I buy just to know exactly what I need and you know the limitations of what exist. Uh also I will say that to people building uh frameworks for this is
please eat your own dog food. Sometimes it's pretty clear that people are building you know agent orchestration frameworks etc but not eating their own dog food. So please do and the other
thing is I'm really glad I took this two weeks off to play with the field because that completely changed I mean that changed the trajectory of the company. I know we're an AI company we should be in
it etc but you know business is such that you're always thinking about the next thing the next thing the next thing and it's the same everywhere. But what I'm urging you to do is to stop and
actually immerse yourself in this and try to see how useful it can be for your company. Uh so you can steal the code. Uh it's not a product that we sell and we don't intend to sell this. Uh you can
read our blog as well. Uh so I haven't explained uh this yet but I will publish something about it. And thank you for your attention. >> [music]